Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 3

Assignment Example However, their points of view starkly contrast each other. Kaplan chooses to explain globalization as a part of the ability of a nation to find areas within their own economic systems that will allow their natural resources and geographic location to dictate the speed and method by which the country shall modernize its infrastructure and business models. These business models however, are based mostly on the basis of the religion or ethnicity of the region in order to play up on the strengths of the people inhabiting particular locations. Although Kaplan's belief makes sense, since it allows a section of the population to advance socially and economically, it has its own drawbacks and failures as well. The main problem with Kaplan's point of view is that it dooms the divisions within a country, its states, to an interdependence that does not allow room for improvement should other states in the country fail to reach its full potential based upon the ethnic and religious climate in th at region. In effect, Kaplan wants us to believe that if a particular portion / sector of economics in a society functions poorly or ceases to function in totality, then the whole state and its adjoining areas should be seen as failures as well. All states that are located within the same vicinity can be assumed to be failing simply because one portion of the economic sector in that area failed to live up to is full potential. As we all know, such a theory cannot be based upon the reality of any modern situation as all businesses, though interdependent, allows for other entities within their sectors to evolve in order to deal with the impending failure of other sectors. Just because one sector fails does not mean that all the members of that particular business chain shall fail as well. Rather, the failure of one area allows for the growth and evolution of the others within the chain. This is a point of view that, although explained in a highly convoluted way by Wright, his theory p ertaining to Globalization seems to support to a certain degree. In Wright's opinion, Globalization is a business movement that can only be spread far and wide provided that a â€Å"natural leader of a moral revolution† can be found. In his personal opinion, that natural leader can be found in only one country, the United States of America. Basing his beliefs upon the historical fact that America has been leading the world in more ways than one since World War I, he advocates the theory that America must spread globalization but it can only be accurately done so provided America takes on the role of conqueror on a global scale. This is something that he believes in even though he admits to himself and to his readers that globalization actually began far longer that we all thought. It actually dates back to prehistorical times, when technology was in its infancy and the invention of the wheel, the cart, and the use of animals to help move trade from town to turn was actually t hought to have began to modernization of business. The failure of Wirght's belief in America as the de-facto leader in Globalization lies in the fact that he did not take into account the potential for the American economy itself to find itself in a death spiral, thus allowing for other countries, such as China, Korea, and other emerging Asian markets, to finally take their places on the world